Does the source include any factual errors or instances of faulty logic? Hemingway Editor There is a rule about long, complex sentences: You can only use them if you know how.
Open-ended questions, rather than questions with simple yes or no answers, are more likely to lead to an in-depth discussion. Graphic Organizers Young students can hardly manage all the ideas they get if you leave them in front of a piece of paper and saying they should write an essay right away.
Writing CSU. Books or journal articles that analyse, critique, or synthesise a range of sources are examples of secondary sources. The process of evaluating scholarly materials also enhances your general skills and ability to: Seek out alternative points of view and differing perspectives, Identify possible bias in the work of others, Distinguish between fact, fiction, and opinion, Develop and strengthen your ability to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant content, Draw cogent, well thought out conclusions, and Synthesize information, extracting meaning through a deliberate process of interpretation and analysis.
Is the review positive? Objective: academic sources aim to examine a topic fairly. In general, the principles that guide your evaluation of print materials are the same that apply to evaluating online resources.
Does the information appear to be valid and well-researched, or is it questionable and unsupported by evidence? However, it may indicate that the content is out-of-date and does not reflect current information about the topic.
Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts. However, poorly organized web page designs or poorly written content is easy to recognize and can be a signal that you should carefully scrutinize the site's content.
For instance, online social networking sites have evolved rapidly over the past few years.